LawRMS

The legal status of the embryo is currently one of the most volatile areas of bio-law, driven by a clash between technological ability (what we can do) and legal definition (what an entity is). For your specialization in Human Rights, the core conflict is between the “Personhood” of the embryo/foetus and the “Bodily Autonomy” of […]

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN RIGHTS AND DUTIES The course shall comprise of the following:

Based on the CBI APP PYQs (which focused on Corruption, Cheating, Conspiracy, and Public Servants), here is the mapped list of Highly Relevant BNS Sections. Category 1: The “Economic Offences” Cluster (Core CBI Work) The CBI primarily investigates financial fraud. The old “420” and “120B” have new homes. BNS Section Old IPC Section Topic Why

The exam questions are heavily skewed towards Criminal Rights (Part III), Constitutional Remedies (Writs), and Service Law (Protection of Public Servants). Tier 1: The “Criminal Jurisprudence” Cluster (Most Critical) These articles appear in almost every paper. You must know every clause verbatim. Article Relevance Why Relevant (PYQ Themes) Article 20 Protection in Conviction (1) Ex

27 percent IT Act Section Relevance PYQ Reference (Why it is Relevant) Possible Questions Section 4 Very High 2021 Q47: Asked about “Legal recognition of electronic records”.2023 Q114: Tested the requirement of “writing” being satisfied by electronic form. 1. Does an email satisfy the legal requirement of a “written” contract? (Yes).2. Does Section 4 apply

25 % CBI specific DSPE Act, 1946 Section Topic Why it is High Relevance (Based on PYQ) Section 4 Superintendence and Administration Crucial Distinction: Questions often trick you on who holds superintendence.• For offences under PC Act: Superintendence vests in CVC.• For other offences: Superintendence vests in Central Govt.– Administration vest in CG appointed Director

CBI APP 25 percent 12 percent 36 percent 27 percent

The “Consent Administration” under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 is effectively the “Gatekeeper Mechanism” of India’s environmental jurisprudence. I do not view this merely as a bureaucratic permit process. I view it as the State (Trustee) granting a license to a private entity to impact a public resource (Water). If this

1. The Jurisprudential Core: Res Communes At its heart, the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD) challenges the concept of private ownership over nature. It draws from the Roman law concept of Res Communes—things that are common to all mankind. I interpret this not just as a property rule, but as a fundamental equity principle: 2. The

Subject: Legal Analysis of Management Issues in Protected Areas (PAs) vis-à-vis Human Rights 1. The Jurisprudential Conflict: “Fortress Conservation” vs. Rights-Based Approaches the central issue in managing National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries is not merely ecological; it is the collision of two legal doctrines: The prevailing management model in India is often termed “Fortress Conservation,”